đď¸Why the Divine Feminine Gives Me the Ick (But I Still Want What She's Selling)
Youâve whispered the affirmations. Youâve tried the womb meditations. Youâve side-eyed the white linen goddess circles while wondering, âWhy does this feelâŚoff?â
Same.
In this episode, I pull the glittery veil off the modern âDivine Feminineâ movement â not to shame the longing underneath it, but to finally name whatâs felt itchy, confusing, and quietly performative for so many of us.
Weâll dig into:
Why the version of the Divine Feminine flooding your feed isnât ancient (spoiler: sheâs more Victorian sĂŠance than temple priestess)
The secret history of Spiritualism, Theosophy, and how gendered mysticism became a polished product
What weâre really aching for beneath the hashtags and rose quartz
How we can reclaim pleasure, power, and embodiment without playing dress-up for the patriarchy
This isnât a call-out. Itâs a reckoning. A remembrance. A path back to the real thingâthe sacred, untamed, body-wired wisdom that no oracle deck can fully hold.
If youâve ever felt both drawn to and repelled by âfeminine embodimentâ spaces⌠this oneâs for you.
đ¨đĽ HOTTEST DEAL OF THE SUMMER đĽđ¨
Reset Your Erotic Rhythm is at its lowest price EVERâAugust only! Price doubles in September and ever month until December!đłđŚ
https://www.bodycompass.me/self-paced-course-rese-erotic-rhythmcouples
đ˛ Help This Podcast Thrive
If your body hummed, your brain lit up, or you whispered âWTF yesâ during this episodeâŚ
đ Donât keep it to yourself.
⨠Download the episode
đą Leave a review (itâs podcast gold and helps us reach more pleasure-curious weirdos)
đŻââď¸ Send it to that one friend who totally vibes with eco-intimacy, sacred sex, or just needs a little erotic permission slip today.
Tag @bodycompass.me if you shareâit seriously means the world đŤ
đż FREE STUFF <3:
Free Erotic Body Reconnection Kit (Previously 3 Best Sexological Bodywork Practices)
The 3 most impactful practices from My Erotic Literacy Vaultâ
field tested in sessions, and personally loved by yours trulyâ
to Melt Freeze, Rebuild Trust, and Restore Erotic Aliveness.
Free Download | Created by a Certified Sexological BodyworkerÂŽ
Download our ultimate FREE erotic symptom decoder:
The DSM-XXX
đ Desire & Somatics Mythos
⨠100+ page reference guide: a RADICAL RECLASSIFICATION of what our culture calls sexual dysfunctionâand what your body knows as sacred. đż
đ DOWNLOAD HERE
DSM-XXX: Desire & Somatics Mythos is our 100+ page reference guide for anyone whoâs ever been told their sexuality is dysfunctionalâwhen really, itâs just been misinterpreted.
Inside, youâll find:
⌠Reframings of so-called âsexual dysfunctionsâ like pelvic pain, vaginismus, anorgasmia, through a trauma-informed, pleasure-centered lens
⌠Somatic context for things like low libido, pain, dissociation, and numbness
⌠Radical translations of what your body might actually be saying when it doesnât follow the cultural script
⌠Alternatives to diagnosis culture that honor nervous system rhythms, safety, and truth over performance
đ DOWNLOAD HERE
đĽ Join the pleasure rebellion
Sacred sex ed, somatic rituals, and a radical return to your body.
đ www.bodycompass.me
Full Transcript Here:
Alright, soâŚ
You know that moment when you start pulling on a little thread, and then suddenly your whole sweater is on the floor?
Yeah. That happened to me.
This episode started because I went on a little quest â a totally casual, not-at-all-obsessive quest â to trace back some of the philosophical and spiritual ideas that so many of us have been living inside.
Ideas about energy. About the Divine Feminine. About cosmic balance, sacred softness, manifestation...
You know â the air we breathe in certain corners of the spiritual community.
And todayâs episode? That quest is definitely a personal one.
Because for years, Iâve had this complicated, itchy, restless relationship with the idea of the âDivine Feminine.â
On one hand, it always rubbed me the wrong way â like a scratchy sweater that everyone else seemed to find soft and cozy, and I couldnât figure out why I felt so uncomfortable in it.
Like... part deep longing, part side-eye, part why does this feel like a cult where everyoneâs just very moisturized?
On the outside, I played along.
I lit the candle. I tried the womb meditations.
I sat in the goddess circles with the silk scarves and whispered intentions.
But internally?
I was like⌠is this it?
Is this really it?
Because what I was being handed felt less like sacred reclamation⌠and more like a gluten-free, vibes-based snack that someone swore would nourish me â but always left me spiritually hungry an hour later.
And yet...
There was this real, aching part of me that wanted it.
That needed it.
That could feel the genuine call underneath all the language and imagery â like a siren song pulling at something deep in my bones.
Something I couldnât â and still canât â ignore.
So for a long time, my strategy was simple: squint, smile, and take what I could get.
Even when the rituals felt off.
Even when womb meditations and flowy goddess circles â and, you know, assigning rose quartz to every life problem â felt more like crumbs than the feast I was really starving for.
I told myself:
Maybe itâs supposed to feel this way.
Maybe I just need to be more receptive.
Maybe this is the best anyone can offer.
So I carried on.
Gathering crumbs.
Ignoring the growing discomfort.
Pretending the hunger wasnât getting louder.
Until eventually... I couldnât.
I found myself avoiding anything that mentioned the Divine Feminine.
Not because I didnât want what it was pointing to â
But because I had become too suspicious that most of what was offered wasnât nourishment.
It was noise.
Echoes of echoes.
A thousand distorted reflections of something that once was real.
What Iâve been craving all along isnât an aesthetic.
It isnât a polarity chart.
It isnât a perfectly lit photo of a woman in white linen communing with her inner goddess.
What I want â what I think many of us want â is a real return.
A living, breathing, blood-and-sky-and-bone connection to something older, wiser, truer than all this polished noise.
Because deep down...
I think we know weâre surviving on crumbs.
Crumbs of something we can feel was once a feast.
Crumbs of something real, vital, ancient, and holy â
That had clearly been edited down for Instagram and rebranded as an empowerment brand.
Eventually, I tapped out.
Maybe you have too.
I started avoiding anything that even mentioned the words âDivine Feminine.â
Not because I didnât still want her â
But because I got tired of the noise.
Tired of the soft-focus performance.
Tired of pretending all this âreceptive radianceâ wasnât just patriarchy in a crystal crown.
And yet â the ache didnât go away.
That siren-call yearning?
Still there.
So I decided to go digging.
Not for a new practice.
Not for a better mantra.
But for the truth.
Something that calls us back to ourselves â
Before we were asked to perform sacredness.
Before we were asked to perform anything at all.
And so... hence my quest.
A personal, obsessive, occasionally exasperated quest to figure out:
Where did all of this come from?
What are we actually being sold when weâre told to "embody the Divine Feminine"?
And more importantly â what are we really hungry for?
Spoiler:
I found a lot of very weird history.
I found Victorian sĂŠances.
I found colonialism dressed up as spirituality.
I found capitalism in a very good wig.
But underneath all that?
I also found something worth fighting for.
So today, weâre going to talk about it.
Weâre going to pull the thread â not to destroy our longing â but to finally, finally respect it enough to stop settling for crumbs.
Because hereâs the thing:
Finding out the truth about your favorite myths doesnât ruin the magic.
It just means you finally get to sit at the real banquet table â
Instead of eating moon-charged Ritz crackers in a linen dress.
The version of the âDivine Feminineâ that dominates Instagram, retreats, and oracle decks?
She isnât ancient.
She was born in the 19th century.
In the drawing rooms of white spiritualists who were trying to reconcile Christianity with their discomfort about sex and womenâs power.
Youâve seen her.
Draped in white linen.
Holding a moonstone.
Whispering about surrender and softness.
She floats through your Instagram feed.
Sheâs stamped on your oracle decks.
She shows up at retreats, swaying her hips in slow circles, inviting you to "reclaim" your femininity.
But what if sheâs not a sacred return â
What if sheâs a carefully constructed mirage?
What if she was invented â yes, invented â out of a deep historical wound,
Shaped not by ancient goddess worship,
But by the constraints of Christianity, colonialism, capitalism â
And the desperate spiritual longings of women who had no true power⌠yet?
To understand how we got from sĂŠance to silk-scarf sisterhood, we have to go back.
19th century.
A time when womenâs voices, bodies, and ambitions were violently restricted by law, church, and culture.
Women were denied education. Denied political voice. Denied bodily autonomy.
But longing for power doesnât disappear.
It adapts.
Enter: Spiritualism.
In the 1840s, a religious movement explodes across America and Britain.
Spiritualism claims the living can communicate with the dead â
And women, uniquely, are the channels.
Suddenly, women are speaking in public â
But only if they say itâs not them speaking.
Itâs the spirits.
The guides.
The higher powers.
They could feel.
But not lead.
They could channel.
But not command.
This was the beginning of a now-familiar equation:
Spiritual woman = passive, intuitive, emotionally sensitive.
But it wasnât liberation.
It was a spiritual loophole.
It taught women that power could only be accessed when they surrendered their agency.
That their worthiness was tied to being a vessel, not a force.
It gave them power â but only if they claimed it wasnât theirs.
So began the pattern:
Womenâs power cloaked in receptivity.
Framed as âopen,â âintuitive,â âemotional.â
Not directive.
Not loud.
Not authoritative.
This wasnât sacred.
It was survival.
And weâre still trapped in it.
Next came Theosophy â
The great-grandmother of todayâs New Age spirituality.
What is Theosophy?
Itâs a spiritual movement from the late 1800s.
Think: occultism, mysticism, and a very white fascination with Eastern religion.
Theosophy taught that all religions share a hidden root.
That souls evolve.
That karma, reincarnation, cosmic cycles â all real.
That Ascended Masters guide humanityâs spiritual evolution from mysterious places like Tibet.
It sounds beautiful.
But hereâs the catch.
It was built during a cultural vacuum â
When Christianity was crumbling and science felt soulless.
So Theosophy said: what if we mix the mystery of the East with the method of the West?
To Victorian women hungry for meaning, it was electrifying.
But it wasnât grounded in deep cultural respect.
It was grounded in exoticism.
Colonial imagination.
Terms like âchakra,â âkarma,â âastral body,â âdivine feminineâ were cherry-picked and rebranded â
To suit Western palates.
And behind it all was Helena Blavatsky â
Russian mystic. Smoker. Swearer. Show-woman.
And deeply influential.
Blavatsky and others wrote about cosmic dualities:
Divine masculine. Divine feminine.
Two opposing principles â coded as male = solar, logic, action.
Female = lunar, emotional, receptive.
Sound familiar?
This wasnât sacred balance.
It was gender essentialism in a silk robe.
Polarity teachings didnât free women.
They spiritualized their confinement.
Now you might be thinking:
If all this is true, why didnât I know?
Good question.
Hereâs why it stayed hidden:
1. It was rebranded.
Over time, Theosophy faded â
But its ideas were passed down.
Into Anthroposophy. Into New Thought. Into Law of Attraction.
Into modern yoga, energy healing, and Instagram spirituality.
But the names changed.
The context disappeared.
You didnât get Theosophy.
You got âDivine Feminine Magnetism.â
âEmbodiment coaching.â
âEnergetic upgrades.â
Same ideas. New packaging.
2. It was whitewashed.
Theosophy borrowed from Hinduism and Buddhism â
Then stripped them of nuance and rewrote them in colonial English.
And modern spirituality rarely unpacks that history.
Because itâs messy. Complicated. Politically inconvenient.
So instead, it hides behind vague phrases:
âAncient wisdom.â âEastern traditions.â âFrom a lineage I was initiated into.â
3. It doesnât feel theosophical anymore.
The word âTheosophyâ sounds dusty.
But the teachings? They got glam.
Youâre not being sold history.
Youâre being sold aesthetics.
4. Thereâs no incentive to trace the lineage.
Many current spiritual teachers donât know theyâre repeating Theosophy.
They learned it from someone who learned it from someone.
No footnotes. No citations. Just vibes.
And no one wants to stop and ask:
Are these teachings appropriated?
Do they reinforce outdated gender roles?
Are we healing⌠or just performing?
Because that might ruin the vibe.
Letâs jump ahead.
1970s.
Second-wave feminism is rising.
Feminist thinkers like Starhawk, Carol P. Christ, Merlin Stone start reclaiming the Goddess.
And this was vital.
It was necessary.
It was real.
They said: Look â there were sacred feminine cultures before patriarchy. There was a time when bleeding, birthing, wild women were holy.
But just as the Goddess was being rememberedâŚ
Capitalism caught up.
And she got rebranded.
Trimmed. Softened.
Not the blood-soaked, rage-filled, chaos-dancing Goddess of myth â
But a version you could sell.
Now sheâs in skincare ads.
In rose quartz.
In white lace.
In $3,000 retreats.
She became a brand.
You could be wild â but only if you looked good doing it.
You could be angry â but only if it was radiant.
You could be powerful â but only if it was soft.
The Goddess became a performance.
A costume.
A curated aesthetic of empowerment that asks you to do absolutely nothing threatening to power structures.
And so here we are.
Taught that reclaiming our power means becoming more palatably feminine.
That our deepest rebellion is to be magnetic.
Receptive.
Fertile.
Glowing.
Surrendered.
Luscious.
Not threatening.
Not chaotic.
Not wild in ways that destroy and remake worlds.
But hereâs the litmus test:
If your Divine Feminine canât be hairy, old, queer, infertile, asexual, raging, godless, loud, or just plain boredâ
Then sheâs not divine.
Sheâs domesticated.
Sheâs a goddess built for the market.
Not the cosmos.
The version of the Divine Feminine weâre sold today?
Sheâs rooted in Victorian etiquette.
In Theosophical gender myths.
In New Age consumerism.
And neoliberal capitalismâs hunger to monetize your longing.
If your feminine canât bleed in public, scream in a boardroom, masturbate in grief, speak in profanity, age, go barren, or refuse to mother anything at all?
Sheâs not divine.
Sheâs digestible.
And I donât want to be digested.
Let me say this clearly:
The obsession with the Divine Feminine?
Itâs not a rebellion against patriarchy.
Itâs proof that patriarchy worked.
Because if the only way you know how to reclaim yourself is through the opposite of masculinity, youâre still playing by the rules.
Real power isnât gendered.
Real healing isnât about âbalancing your masculine and feminine energies.â
Itâs about getting off the stage altogether.
Itâs letting your body lead you â
Through grief. Through rage. Through orgasm. Through stillness.
Through every contradiction.
Without trying to squeeze it into an archetype â even a sacred one.
The ancient feminine didnât exist in polarity.
She existed in complexity.
In contradiction.
In the full, living spiral of being.
So maybe youâre not here to âembody the Divine Feminine.â
Maybe youâre here to dismantle every story that told you power had to look like anything at all.
Letâs be honest.
When we talk about the Divine Feminine, weâre not just talking about an archetype.
Weâre talking about a longing.
A longing so deep, so ancient, so carved into our bones it aches.
We are not wrong to want her.
We are not wrong to want softness.
To want safety.
To want to be held by something older, wilder, more trustworthy than capitalism or gender norms.
We are not wrong to want to feel connected â
To our wombs, our erotic pulse, our cycles.
To live in a world where weâre not punished for feeling too much, wanting too much, taking up too much space.
We are trying to remember something real.
And that longing? Itâs not petty.
Itâs not personal.
Itâs ancestral.
Itâs collective.
Because there was a time â before patriarchy â
When the world was not split into domination and submission.
When blood wasnât hidden, but honored.
When sexuality wasnât moralized, but ritualized.
When the body wasnât a shame site, but a sacred site.
In Neolithic cultures, we find goddess worship not as idolization â
But as recognition.
Of the female body as portal.
Of the Earth as mirror.
Of life as a cycle, not a ladder.
Weâre not trying to go back.
Weâre trying to remember.
So hereâs the deeper truth:
We are not longing to be more feminine.
We are longing to be more ourselves.
To be undivided.
Unperformed.
Integrated.
To call every exiled part of us home:
The too-much part.
The grieving part.
The sacred-no-saying part.
The rage that says this ends with me.
We are longing to spiral like green things grow â without asking for permission.
To bloom.
To decay.
To rage and rest in rhythm, not hierarchy.
And thatâs where The Body Compass Method comes in.
Itâs not a map someone else made.
Itâs not an aesthetic.
Itâs not a branding of your sacredness.
Itâs a return.
To the signals your bodyâs been whispering all along.
To the truth that lives under the performance.
To the sacredness that never needed white linen or moonlight to be real.
The Body Compass teaches you to follow what feels alive â
Not what looks impressive.
To listen to your pleasure, your rage, your no, your desire â
As wisdom.
Not to âembody the feminine.â
But to stop performing sacredness and start being sacred again.
So no â weâre not wrong to want the Divine Feminine.
But maybe what we really wantâŚ
Is to finally stop outsourcing our sacredness.
To stop dressing it up.
To stop performing it.
And to start remembering:
The sacred isnât in the image.
Itâs in your instincts.
Your disobedience.
Your refusal to shrink.
That is divine.
[Outro Music Fades In]
If this shook you?
Good.
Itâs time to crack the altar â
And build something truer.
Iâll see you next time.